Jump to content

User talk:Tournasol7

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 12 hours ago by QICbot in topic Quality Image Promotion
 
My main page
 
Discuss
 Quality images 
Quality images
 Featured pictures 
Featured pictures
 Valued pictures 
Valued pictures
 

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue in Foirail Public Garden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anne church in Arques 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:29, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Caumont Ariege (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 07:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arbas river in Mane (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Mane HG (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Mane (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 07:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I'm a little hesitant to the tree trunk on the left, but ok. --ArildV 09:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte Principale in Sainte-Eulalie-de-Cernon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:32, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etang de Guzet (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:32, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Beas from Plateau de Souliou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:32, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Mane (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Lafitte-Vigordane (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquilegia vulgaris in Aveyron (5) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 21:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 18:53, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiking sign near Puech du Pal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 21:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Le Bosc 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 21:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 07:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cascade d'Ars (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:51, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Aulus-les-Bains (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (maybe consider reducing the exposure slightly) --ArildV 08:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Oust (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 07:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:36, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Galy in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:24, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 08:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 08:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel de Sambucy de Sorgues in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 09:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GR 10 Aulus-les-Bains (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Dr. Thomas Liptak 14:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Beas from Aulus-les-Bains (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Lafitte-Vigordane (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Gratens (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Causse Noir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
.Good picture, But in my opinion the tree on the right (very noisy) is annoying and, in addition, there are many dust spots in the sky. --Lmbuga 11:07, 19 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality now --Lmbuga 20:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City hall of Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 16:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Vezins-de-Levezou (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 16:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-17 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:43, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 16:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Beas from Aulus-les-Bains (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --0959kedi 16:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic de Crabe (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Peyssies (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Peyssies (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoir de l'Ayrolle in Millau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 18:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lavoir de l'Ayrolle in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 18:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 18:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 18:56, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains from Refuge de Guzettou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 08:38, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Labastide-Clermont (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:24, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bois-de-la-Pierre (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Bois-de-la-Pierre (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 22:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains from Refuge de Guzettou (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:51, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac, Aveyron, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 07:51, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mill on the old bridge in Millau 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mill on the old bridge in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Notre-Dame-de-la-Salvage 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Millau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Millau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:30, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:30, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support excellent management of shadows and highlights, slight and forgivable purple CA near the window on the right, good quality. --Terragio67 10:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I have a little doubt if there is a slight optical distortion, but the image texture is superb, very good quality. --Terragio67 10:05, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:15, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ben O’Connor 18th stage Tour de France 2025 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:25, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:23, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont Beas from Plateau de Souliou (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I would also have liked to have a cropped image in which only the corbels appeared. --Lmbuga 11:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etang de Guzet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Gratens (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Labastide-Clermont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:47, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:23, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountains seen from Plateau de Souliou (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:23, 26 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Aulus-les-Bains (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Peyssies (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-du-Larzac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:13, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:49, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Francis church in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 08:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 08:24, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Millau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Pegayrolles (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:47, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Pl du Mandarous in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Labastide-Clermont (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Bois-de-la-Pierre (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Aulus-les-Bains (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ars river in Aulus-les-Bains (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:50, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (50).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germanus church in St-Georges-de-Luzencon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok, good quality but not very good composition imo, to much foreground imo. Maybe 7x6 crop? --ArildV 19:44, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolmen de Saint-Martin-du-Larzac 3 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolmen de Saint-Martin-du-Larzac 3 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Peyssies (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Oust (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Mane (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:02, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Lafitte-Vigordane (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Gratens (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --I.Mahesh 23:12, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lupus church in Labastide-Clermont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Bois-de-la-Pierre (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Peyssies (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Peyssies (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:07, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Lafitte-Vigordane (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:09, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Innocents church in Bussieres (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Contrast could be improved. --XRay 06:40, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Rustroff (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franciscan convent in Rustroff (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Rustroff (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de Cureplat in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Lacarre (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Innocents church in Bussieres (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Rustroff (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Bettembourg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Gnoeee 09:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Naussac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Bettembourg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Lacarre (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Rustroff (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Tarn river from Pouncho d'Agast (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn river in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:45, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue in the Parc de la Tete d'Or (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa Pink Voluptia in Parc de la Tete d'Or (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Rustroff (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18th stage Tour de France 2025 (50).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:20, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Bettembourg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Soltau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:55, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balduinstrasse 1 in Kaisersesch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Ulmen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks good but the aspect ratio can be improved (stretching the image in the vertical direction to make the circles circular) --Poco a poco 06:54, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:33, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry in Millau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew church in Massiac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Bettembourg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Bettembourg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai Fulchiron in Lyon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catalpa ovata in Parc de la Tete d'Or (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply