User talk:Llez

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Llez!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Archives /Archives/2010 (1) /Archives/2010 (2) /Archives/2011 (1) /Archives/2011 (2) /Archives/2012 (1) /Archives/2012 (2) /Archives/2013 (1) /Archives/2013 (2) /Archives/2014 (1) /Archives/2014 (2) /Archives/2015 (1) /Archives/2015 (2) /Archives/2016 (1) /Archives/2016 (2) /Archives/2017 (1) /Archives/2017 (2) /Archives/2017 (3) /Archives/2018 (1) /Archives/2018 (2) /Archives/2018 (3) /Archives/2019 (1) /Archives/2019 (2) /Archives/2019 (3) /Archives/2019 (4) /Archives/2020 (1) /Archives/2020 (2) /Archives/2020 (3) /Archives/2020 (4) /Archives/2021 (1) /Archives/2021 (2) /Archives/2021 (3) /Archives/2021 (4) /Archives/2022 (1) /Archives/2022 (2) /Archives/2022 (3) /Archives/2022 (4) /Archives/2023 (1) /Archives/2023 (2) /Archives/2023 (3) /Archives/2023 (4) /Archives/2024 (1) /Archives/2024 (2) /Archives/2024 (3) /Archives/2024 (4) /Archives/2025 (1) /Archives/2025 (2)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gafrarium divaricatum (Forked Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venus nux, left valve, fossil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polititapes vetulus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Problem in VI

Thank you for your comments and your good care in VI. I'm trying to quit coffee but... it's not easy and it shows. {{smile}} Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cylichna aethiopica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Conus gloriamaris 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Conus gloriamaris 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Polititapes vetulus, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clausinella basteroti, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mnestia girardi, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:47, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. marmorata, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea ovata var. marmorata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circenita callipyga 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:09, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callista laevigata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Circenita callipyga, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callista laevigata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tapes sulcarius (Furrowed Venus), juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anomia ephippium 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), yellow form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), orange form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anomia ephippium var. radiata, (Saddle Oyster), purple form, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Finella pupoides, shell, slender shape.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chattonia triangularis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meroena multisulcata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chattonia triangularis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meroena multisulcata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meroena multisulcata, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Meroena multisulcata, juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Striarca lactea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Striarca lactea 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wieskirche 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wieskirche 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vertigo angustior, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Petro Stelte (talk) 12:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Striarca lactea, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Striarca lactea, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asaphis violascens 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carychium tridentatum (Long-toothed Herald Snail), fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Septifer cumingii, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Asaphis violascens (Pacific Asaphis), yellow form, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara transversa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belgrandia germanica, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara transversa (Transverse Ark Clam), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Grandma and grandpa with stuffed bunny.jpg

File:Grandma and grandpa with stuffed bunny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anadara transversa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:18, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anadara transversa (Transverse Ark Clam), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:30, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Callistocypraea aurantium 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valvata alpestris, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxytoma spec. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Subulina octona 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia perinesa 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Subulina octona, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 11:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia perinesa, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 05:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grammatodon muensteri, internal mould.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Planorbis sibiricus, fossil shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope .--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Striarca symmetrica 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lirophora paphia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 05:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Altdahn - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Tanstein - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enantiostreon multicostatum, juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahner Burgengruppe - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Altdahn - Dahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lirophora paphia (King Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris deshayesi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritter - Dahn 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:37, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excellichlamys spectabilis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buntsandstein - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astarte opalina, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hôtel Fairmont Le Montreux Palace 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hôtel Fairmont Le Montreux Palace 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 29.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glorichlamys aff. elegantissima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 04:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excellichlamys spectabilis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 08:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelstisch - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buntsandstein - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris deshayesi, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- Petro Stelte (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Excellichlamys spectabilis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA at the branches at the left side to remove --Ermell 05:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Done THanks for the review --Llez 05:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA at the branches at the left side to remove --Ermell 05:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Done THanks for the review --Llez 05:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:42, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Grafendahn - Dahn - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Excellichlamys spectabilis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glücksschwein von Schwetzingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Torpfosten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Torpfosten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirapecten rastellum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Mittelbau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Ehrenhofflügel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Eingang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamarcka avellana 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Puttenbassin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:36, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Gartenvase 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Ehrenhof - Mittelbau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:59, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia virescens 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Arionbrunnen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Arionbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teufelsschmiede - Hinterweidenthal 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lamarcka avellana, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:15, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirapecten rastellum, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ritter - Dahn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbatia virescens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Laubengang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia virescens, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cryptopecten nux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindapecten muscosus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barbatia virescens, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View of the Upper Rhine Plain from Battenberg Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of the Upper Rhine Plain from Battenberg Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloripallium speciosum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:11, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cryptopecten nux, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kirschgarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 06:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 06:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gloripallium speciosum, juvenile, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Minarett 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee - Wandelgang 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:11, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Photo request

Hi Llez, I found this excellent photo of yours and I would like to nominate it for FP at some point. However, I notice there is some blue/purple CA on the roof on the rightmost building. When you have some time (no rush) would it be possible for you to correct this and I'll nominate the picture? (feel free to ignore if you don't think this image has FP potential.) All best, Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Moschee 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Merkurtempel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Merkurtempel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Laubengang 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Laubengang 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 18:17, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lembulus bicuspidatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Wasserfall 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Mars 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Merkurtempel 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 05:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lembulus bicuspidatus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kugelallee - Ziersäule 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Kugelallee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Verbindungskanal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ludwigsburg Palace 05.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ludwigsburg Palace 05.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loripes orbiculatus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 16 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 05:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Flussgott Donau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Flussgott Rhein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Bacchus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lembulus bicuspidatus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gyrineum roseum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Sonnenrelief 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:49, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Sonnenreliefs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Apollotempel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 05:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lembulus bicuspidatus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loripes orbiculatus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Badhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loripes orbiculatus var. leucoma, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 03:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loripes orbiculatus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Porzellanhäuschen - Fliesen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gyrineum roseum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyrineum roseum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Brunnen der Wasserspeienden Vögel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Brunnen der Wasserspeienden Vögel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saccostrea cuccullata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Römisches Wasserkastell 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Perspektiv 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Laubengang zum Perspektiv 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Loripes orbiculatus var. leucoma, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Timoclea imbricata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Römisches Aquädukt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Römisches Aquädukt 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harpax spinosus, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 03:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irus mitis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördliche Lindenarkaden 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Lindenarkaden am Orangeriegarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Römisches Aquädukt 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Timoclea imbricata, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 11:21, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dosinia concentrica 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- 26D 05:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Hirschgruppe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:49, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Hirschgruppe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irus mitis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Orangerie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Orangerie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Herbst 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Merkurtempel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Level of detail is poor, not sure whether you can save it --Poco a poco 06:53, 13 June 2025 (UTC)  Info Thanks for the review. I made a new version from RAW --Llez 09:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC) A hard call, I wouldn't promote it. In this version you forgot to fix the tilt. --Poco a poco 07:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)  Done Tilt corrected --Llez 18:32, 21 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Brunnen der Wasserspeienden Vögel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Schwetzingen - Nördlicher Zirkelbau 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irus mitis, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Westfassade - Uhr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Westfassade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irus mitis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:09, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dosinia concentrica, juvenile, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 09:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamelea gallina 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Arkadische Atalante 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:05, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Böotische Atalante 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamelea gallina 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callocardia nitida, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mytilus galloprovincialis trigonus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Südliches Querhaus - Portal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Südliches Querhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamelea gallina var. corrugatula (Chicken Venus), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mytilus galloprovincialis trigonus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Altar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Altarraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Schwetzingen - Römisches Aquädukt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Few blue CAs in the leaves of the trees. --Sebring12Hrs 07:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review --Llez 08:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC) I can still see purple CAs at left. --Sebring12Hrs 11:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint --Llez 05:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 11:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chamelea gallina var. corrugatula (Chicken Venus), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 05:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantareus apertus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:38, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Deckengewölbe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Fenster über Westeingang 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:44, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Altarfenster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mytilus galloprovincialis trigonus (Mediterranean mussel), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 13:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mytilus galloprovincialis trigonus (Mediterranean mussel), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmorana serpentina 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 15:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Südliches Querhaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 15:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jaton decussatus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaton decussatus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chamelea gallina 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Emporensäule 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Taufbecken 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papillifera papillaris papillaris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:48, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows are very noisy, needs to be fixed --Benjism89 05:55, 3 July 2025 (UTC)  Done Noise reduced --Llez 06:24, 3 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Benjism89 06:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona cuneata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:25, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona cuneata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Schwarzdornreisig - Auffangbecken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Schwarzdornreisig 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:49, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Schwarzdornreisig 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papillifera papillaris papillaris, ribbed form, shell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, Interior, view to the east with choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paphia amabilis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Salzablagerungen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Salzablagerungen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Schwarzdornreisig - Auffangbecken 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, Interior, view to the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:01, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona cuneata (Cuneate Wedge Shell), right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:01, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gafrarium alfredense 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Salzablagerungen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Gradierwerk - Salzablagerungen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, Altar window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paphia amabilis, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona cuneata (Cuneate Wedge Shell), left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 10:10, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Nördliches Querhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, pulpit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gafrarium alfredense, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 10:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 28.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 28.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City church Bad Rappenau, baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula connectens, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachidontes modiolus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:08, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss - Portal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Wasserschloss 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 05:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hiatula connectens, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitar rudis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:39, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kurpark - Blumenbeet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brachidontes modiolus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinengarten - Monopteros 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinengarten - Monopteros 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Kanzel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:32, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachidontes modiolus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kurpark - Blumenbeet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:18, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitar rudis 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Saline - Bohrturm - Pumpenhäuschen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Saline - Bohrturm - Pumpenhäuschen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Saline - Bohrturm - Pumpenhäuschen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachidontes modiolus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful —Nikride (talk) 07:09, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pitar rudis ssp. gracilentus, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 05:41, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callista elegans 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Bank 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Bank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Bänke 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pitar rudis ssp. gracilentus, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:53, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 08:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Altarfenster 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bad Rappenau - Evangelische Stadtkirche - Altarfenster 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Aristeas-test (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callista elegans, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 14:38, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vepricardium spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia flava var. ornata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:25, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Cornus kousa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Schnecke?

Servus Liez, habe heute diese Schnecke gefunden. Im Netz finde ich Mittelmeer-Sandschnecke (Theba pisana) als Vorschlag. Das scheint mir aber unwahrscheinlich. Du kannst mir da sicher weiterhelfen. Vielen Dank im voraus. Ermell (talk) 22:26, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Ermell, bitte entschuldige die verspätete Antwort, ich habe die letzten zwei Tage leider nicht auf die Diskussionsseite geschaut.

Es müsste sich bei der Schnecke un eine Gemeine Heideschnecke (Helicella itala) handeln. Die Bänderung kann variabel sein, aber dein Exemplar passt sehr gut: Hell mit dunklen Bändern (können auch fehlen) und ein sehr flaches Gewinde, s.a. die Bilder hier. Viele Grüße Llez (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

PS: Theba pisana kommt nur an Küsten und in Küstennähe vor.

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callista elegans, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 10:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia flava var. ornata 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia flava var. ornata 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:32, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia flava var. ornata 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:44, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick von der Schwanner Warte Richtung Nordwesten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwanner Warte - Straubenhardt - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwanner Warte - Straubenhardt - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parvicardium minimum, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Delosperma cooperi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Echinocereus triglochidiatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 21 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Spondylus varius, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Spondylus varius, has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another set, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lucina columbella, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope ReneeWrites (talk) 20:44, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris stellata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:28, 22 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --0959kedi 13:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Yucca rostrata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Mustergarten - Sarracenia flava var. ornata 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycymeris spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --0959kedi 13:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucina columbella 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 20 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --0959kedi 13:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schwanner Warte, view from northwest..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Spielplatz - Kletterfelsen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Rappe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:30, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona listeri 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kursee - Springbrunnen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:35, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kursee - Springbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glycymeris stellata, right valve, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:55, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tucetona pectinata, right valve, juvenile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona listeri 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Feuerbeet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Feuerbeet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona listeri, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:16, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Tagooty (talk) 09:09, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona faba 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kurcafé im Salinengarten - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kurcafé im Salinengarten - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kurcafé im Salinengarten - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 05:12, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona listeri, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona faba 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenamtsgebäude 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --YikyuenG 05:31, 27 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenamtsgebäude 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenamtsgebäude 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Les Amoureux - Michal - Montreux 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Les Amoureux - Michal - Montreux 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latona spec 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Altes Rathaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Feuerbeet - Salinenamtsgebäude 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona faba, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful —Nikride (talk) 07:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Latona faba, left valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:21, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Springbrunnen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:13, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Rathaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Rathaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limopsis anomala, right valve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papustyla pulcherrima 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Salinenpark - Bienenbäume 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Rappenau - Kirchplatz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trochulus striolatus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 05:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2025 (UTC)