User talk:GRDN711

Archives 1 - 2018 - 2019 2 - 2020 - 2021 3 - 2022 - 2023 4 - 2024 - 2025

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-10 03 MS FRAM - IMO 9370018 - Ushuaia, Argentina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add a CAT for the location. --Tagooty 03:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC) Done. Thank you for the review. --GRDN711 23:08, 30 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-05-03 02 SEASPAN EAGLE - IMO 9432971 – Ogden Point, BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-05-03 01 SEASPAN EAGLE - IMO 9432971 – Ogden Point, BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seaspan Eagle – IMO 9432971 – right side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-12-20 01 BBC ROSARIO - IMO 9337224 – Ogden Point BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 03:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BBC Rosario – IMO 9337224 – frontal (bow) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and used -- Petro Stelte (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-04-23 01 PAVO LEADER - IMO 9181560 – Off Ogden Point, BC Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:43, 20 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ziv 00:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shay steam engine #2 of the Cass Scenic Railway, Cass, West Virginia USA.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment Agreed, but too dark. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment @Agnes Monkelbaan: @Charlesjsharp: Have not worked with this image for some time but thought your comments had merit. Re-processed from original, lightened (particularly black engine) and re-cropped image. Like this version better. Your thoughts? --GRDN711 (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

• Oke, dank u. --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 03:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-05-24 01 Tugboat, CHARLES H. CATES IV - MMSI 316005724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tugboat, Charles H. Cates IV – MMSI 316005724 – port (left) view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:35, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-05 01 GEIRANGER - IMO 7816408 – Hjørundfjorden, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:54, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-05 02 GEIRANGER - IMO 7816408 – Hjørundfjorden, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015-09-18 MS OCEAN ENDEAVOUR - IMO 7625811, at Qeqertarsuaq Island (Karrat Fjord), Greenland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-09-18 MS OCEAN ENDEAVOUR - IMO 7625811, at Qeqertarsuaq Island (Karrat Fjord), Greenland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-05 03 GEIRANGER - IMO 7816408 – Hjørundfjorden, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2023-05-05 04 GEIRANGER - IMO 7816408 – Hjørundfjorden, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:56, 31 May 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ziv 14:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geiranger – IMO 7816408.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
HMCS Frédérick Rolette (AOPV 434) – IMO 4702541 – under construction.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:45, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-05-31 05 SEASPAN OSPREY - IMO 9858022 – Ogden Point, BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Overall ok imo, good composition and light but slightly narrow DOF. --ArildV 06:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-06-04 01 CARNIVAL LUMINOSA - IMO 9398905 – Ogden Point BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 00:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Straigtened. Thanks for noticing. --GRDN711 23:16, 8 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carnival Luminosa – IMO 9398905.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Can you straighten the horizon? It's leaning to the left.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment The boat too! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Thank you for your comments. Sorry - not too many vertical lines in this image and I did not see the tilt. Have implemented a correction. See if this helps. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used. For me ok. Thank you for correction.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2025-02-02 02 Greater roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) - AZ USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only the head seems in focus on the bird. --Sebring12Hrs 20:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC) The head and eye contact are in focus as is most of the bird with the excpetion of the tail feathers. The question is whether this is good enough. --GRDN711 17:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Looking for info on a ship

I've created Category:IMO 2471957 and the corresponding Wikidata item with limited info that I could find in vesseltracker.com and a few other sites. I wonder if you could help to improve this with year of build etc? Tagooty (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Tagooty:

First a little background on setting up categorization for a ship image. In Commons, you need 3 pieces of information to set up the two Commons categories for uploading a ship image. A ship is positively identified if it has a ship name, a build year and a universal identifying number.

You can usually find this information with a Google search based on the Ship Name, and confirmed at Shipspotting.com, MarineTraffic.com and other ship databases.

Ship Name – LEYNIR (example)

Pusher tugboat, LEYNIR, leaving the harbor at Reykjavik, Iceland, heading into Faxaflói Bay with a storm coming off Mount Esja.

Build Year of ship - YYYY as in 2020 (example)

Universal Identifying Number of ship – IMO 9126388 (example)

For ships, there are 3 universal identifying numbers recognized by Commons in the following order of preference:

IMO ####### (International Maritime Organization; 7-digits; global forever ID - hull number never changes over ship life) is the best identifying number for ships if available.

ENI ######## (European Number of Identification; 8-digits; Europe forever ID but not global forever - never changes over ship life) – acceptable if IMO# is not available.

MMSI ######### (Maritime Mobile Service Identity; MMSI ######### (Maritime Mobile Service Identity; 9-digits; not global forever - depends on flag state; can change in rare cases over ship life – example Eems Delphia) – use only if IMO or ENI is not available.

If none of above universal identifying numbers are available for a ship image (usually a historical ship), Ship-by-Name Category should be named "<name of ship> (ship, <build-year>, <place-of-build> <yard # if available>)".

Your ferry image, Trei Fre, is found in various ship databases (search on "Trei Fre MMSI 247195700) but you have it incorrectly placed in Commons under the IMO parent category instead of MMSI. This ship apparently does not have an IMO or hull #. An extra point is that VG 3744 is a registration number for the country of Italy where the ship is registered. While it is an "ON - offical number" for the country of registration, it is not used for categorization in Commons.

If you are OK with this, I will go ahead and re-categorize your images under a MMSI parent category and you can see what I have done following this outline. It seems complicated but its not once you have gone through it a few times. It is a good system for categoization of ships.

Please let me know,

Gordon GRDN711 (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed explanation, much clearer now. Please go ahead and re-cat, will be much appreciated. Tagooty (talk) 03:41, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Tagooty:

Created MMSI 247195700 as a sub-category under parent Category:Vessels by MMSI number.

Unfortunately, I was unable to determine when this ferry/passenger boat was built.

As a Ship-by-Name Category (a ship can have more than one name over its useful life under the same universal ID), I created Category:Trei Fre (passenger ferry) as sub-category under parent Category:MMSI 247195700, and placed both of your images in it.

Suggest you delete “Category:IMO 2471957” as I am not sure such an IMO number exists and if so, it is not for this ship. GRDN711 (talk) 17:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. I've nominated the IMO CAT for deletion. Tagooty (talk) 03:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2024-11-28 04 K.J. GARDNER - IMO 9420150 - Ogden Point BC CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 20:02, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-04 01 K.J. GARDNER - IMO 9420150 - St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:08, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-04 02 K.J. GARDNER - IMO 9420150 - St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-09-04 03 K.J. GARDNER - IMO 9420150 - St. John's NL CAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 23:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 August 2025 (UTC)