User talk:Ermell

Archives Archive Index

Nabend,

Reinhold. Meinen Sie nicht, Sie könnten an File:Venedig Venedig Santi Giovanni e Paolo Denkmal des Dogen Pietro Mocenigo-20110312-RM-080721.jpg etwas tun. Ich wollte gern das Rot etwas weniger knätschig und die Lichter versuchen noch was zu dimmen, ob da noch was drinsteckt. Wenn Ihnen das zu aufwendig ist, werde ich eine Vorlage nutzen. Ich verstehe aber Ihr Bedürfnis die Bilder zu schützen, ich selbst fotografiere in raw. MenkinAlRire (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Vergessen zu sagen, dass ich Ihres dann dem anderen, sehr ähnlichen, doch den Vorzug geben würde. MenkinAlRire (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Servus Menkin, habe eine neue Version hochgeladen und hoffe das es einigermaßen passt. Gruß. Ermell (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Ermell – Oops, nee, leider garnicht. Ich schaue mir Bilder immer in voller Auflösung an. Da wirst Du hier ein violettes Wunder erleben, mit Kontrast wie Höhenlinien. In die Richtung hat es user:Didier Descouens auch übertrieben. Ich dachte, Du hast die Sache gut in der Hand, aber offensichtlich machst Du es richtig, und machst vor dem Knipsen alles richtig, vermutlich mit Stativ.

Die Situation hätte eigentlich HDR Technik erfordert, dann wären die Lichter nicht ausgefressen. Damals brauchte man dafür aber noch ein Stativ. Ich hatte aber keine Lust auf die Schlepperei.

Dachte ich mir, dass das Bild schon was her ist. --MenkinAlRire (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Kann es sein, daß Sie ACDSee verwenden? Ich könnte Ihnen genau sagen, was ich machen würde, wenn die Neugierde besteht. So ist aus dem Bild nicht so arg viel mehr zu machen, da es überschärft ist, wenn Sie sich etwa das Ornament im Gebälk und die wie ausgeschnittenen Köpfe vor den Muscheln der Nischen ansehen, während die fensterseitigen Gesichtshälften alle ausgeblüht scheinen. Ich kann sonst ein Derivat hochladen, was aber schade wäre, weil es ja Ihr Foto ist, so daß es an Ort und Stelle schöner wäre.

Ich arbeite mit Adobe Lightroom und Photoshop. Ich kann die RAW Datei gerne zur Verfügung stellen.

Gerne, ist ein immer wieder zitiertes Monument. Wäre mir den Versuch wert. Aber wie, per Mail? --MenkinAlRire (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Stimmt, das Formular ist ein Standard, nicht nachgedacht.

Noch eine andere Frage: Die violette 'Wurz aus dem Wald,' deren Blüten Sie heute auf Ihrer Seite zeigten, da heißt es, dass 12(?) Einzelbilder dafür verarbeitet wurden. Ist das eine Einstellung Ihrer Kamera oder ist das aktive Zauberei?

Die Kamera macht bis zu hundert Aufnahmen und verschiebt bei jeder die Focusebene. Mit Software, wie hier Helicon Focus, wird der Stapel dann zusammengesetzt. Durch das sogenannte Focus Stacking erhält man ein durchgängig scharfes Bild.--Ermell (talk) 06:05, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Geil. Jetzt noch Zauberei... und bald in jedem Handy. Für WM ist das natürlich toll, man schafft quasi gültige Darstellungen (obwohl, danach kommt noch 3D, aber da verlassen wir die Fotografik.)

Die Software wird in der Kamera installiert oder ferngesteuert, nicht? Denn, was verschiebt den Fokus? - Ich heiße übrigens Armin. MenkinAlRire (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1L2PghWXsKC9qO6jE8ajYPgQw8-m5dpCY?usp=sharing

ist der Link zu dem Original. Viel Erfolg. Ermell (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainbernheim Stadtmauer-20120422-RM-171010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberöchstädt Brunnen-20120418-RM-153548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberöchstädt Brunnen-20120418-RM-153543.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:11, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubrunn Steinbruch-20180826-RM-163847.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainbernheim Stadtmauer-20120422-RM-171055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Request to Use Image of Manfred Honeck for Social Media Feature

Hello, I’m a Social Media Manager at IDAGIO. We are planning to feature Manfred Honeck on our socials and hope it’s okay for us to use the image with proper credit. Thank you in advance! 2A02:2455:86AA:9F00:7572:245E:CC14:5493 12:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

O.K. Thanks for the info. Ermell (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iphofen Mainbernheimer Tor-20120422-RM-170249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iphofen Mainbernheimer Tor-20120422-RM-170216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:54, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainbernheim Stadtmauer-20120422-RM-171004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainbernheim Stadtmauer-20120422-RM-171001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:53, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shimokitazawa Getränkeautomat-20091016-RM-170655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreuschendorf Kirche Altar-20250719-RM-155158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luzern Dampfschiff URI-20130829-RM-155849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful image, good quality -- Spurzem 06:20, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7-20140109-RM-123146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothenburg ob der Tauber Spitalbastei -20130816-RM-161554.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothenburg ob der Tauber Spitalbastei -20130816-RM-161530.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wernsdorf (Strullendorf) Kaugummiautomat-20090419-RM-095440.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang Bildstock-20090411-RM-163614.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang Bildstock-20090411-RM-163405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stublang Bildstock-20090411-RM-163256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche-20250615-RM-165705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:52, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Rathaus-20250615-RM-170039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:56, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Rathaus-20250615-RM-165900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Tür-20250615-RM-165845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:57, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Tür-20250615-RM-165809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:49, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Turm-20250615-RM-170109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:56, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

FPC File:Puits Rodolphe 01.jpg

Due to the voters' comments and the stacking errors pointed out by Milseburg, I've decided to return to the original version. Please check the nomination page again. Greetings and thanks --Llez (talk) 05:51, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astheim Altar Frank Ritter Straße-20250615-RM-174019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astheim Altar-20250615-RM-173454.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 05:59, 2 August 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astheim Kloster Konventsbau Tür-20250615-RM-172840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astheim Kloster Konventsbau Tür-20250615-RM-172857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:03, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astheim Klosterkirche Tür-20250615-RM-173118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Ölberghaus -20250615-RM-165519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a bit too warm. --XRay 06:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Portal-20250615-RM-170057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Portal-20250615-RM-170010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Bildstock-20250615-RM-165756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kürnach Kirche Bildstock-20250615-RM-165616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:10, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schachbrettfalter auf Karde-20250713-RM-170908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 09:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagpfauenauge (Aglais io) auf Buddleja-20250711-RM-124724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon) auf Buddleja-20250711-RM-125609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwalbenschwanz (Papilio machaon) auf Buddleja-20250711-RM-125608.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2025 (UTC)