Jump to content

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipe-tan Nude.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipe-tan Nude.png

[edit]

I don't see what possible educational purpose this image could ever serve. For one thing it is extremely low quality. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And how exactly is it “extremely low quality?” That’s a vague complaint a few steps above “it just sucks” PS please be a bit more civil than this next time. Dronebogus (talk) 04:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On artistic level, it is simply poorly drawn. It looks extremely amateurish like it was drawn by a novice artist. The brushwork is extremely messy. It's simply too low quality to ever be considered worthy of inclusion anywhere. If you don't want to get a rude response, don't speedily keep your own drawings out of process. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That isn’t a justification for being rude. Dronebogus (talk) 04:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that for the extremely niche-use case of a fully nude Wikipedia-tan, we already have much better drawn and cleaner images [1] [2]. Hemiauchenia (talk) 07:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 22:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Rhododendrites, and I also agree with their suggestion to nuke everything in the category. This is just embarrassing. --Beeblebrox (talk) 02:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete And refer the uploading user to T&S for a possible ban from all of Wikimedia. ජපස (talk) 03:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @ජපස: You can only “ban someone from all of Wikimedia” for egregious actions, described as following:
    • Users engaging in significant or repeated harassment of users on multiple projects;
    • Users engaging in significant or repeated harassment off of the Wikimedia sites so as to threaten (emotionally or physically) users;
    • Place in danger, significantly compromise or otherwise threaten the trust or safety of our users or employees;
    • Users repeatedly or egregiously violating our Terms of Use, such as through hosting illegal content on Wikimedia servers; or
    • Threatening or compromising the security of Wikimedia infrastructure.
    What you are suggesting is an insane overreaction. Dronebogus (talk) 04:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Place in danger, significantly compromise or otherwise threaten the trust or safety of our users or employees;" A case can easily be made that this is what you are doing here. Your actions as of late definitely do not promote an environment of trust and safety for users of this website. I would argue that they significantly compromise it, in fact. ජපස (talk) 04:13, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ජපස: Don’t you understand Trust and Safety is part of the legal department? I’m pretty sure it covers shit like actual personal threats, malware, prolonged and deliberate cyberbullying, child porn, etc. not drawings of boobs and community rules violations. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Office_actions#General_information Dronebogus (talk) 04:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What I’m saying is: you are basically engaging in frivolous legal threats that are much more likely to w:wp:BOOMERANG back on you. Dronebogus (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a "legal threat". This is a procedural matter for the way WMF-controlled websites are managed. I think you should re-read what you wrote and ask yourself whether you just admitted to committing community rules violations. You are also welcome to ask T&S directly if your understanding of their role and the scope of the possible actions they might take is correct. ජපස (talk) 04:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ජපස: It’s still a waste of T&S’s time. Yes, I admit to breaking rules sometimes, I’m not endorsing my actions. Dronebogus (talk) 04:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're basically making your own child porn. You should probably stop talking now. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:08, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Beeblebrox: @ජපස: She is an adult here. It’s in the category “adult Wikipe-tan”. She has large breasts and hips. It says “grown-up” in the description. I don’t know how you possibly couldn’t tell that. This is a huge misunderstanding. You can delete it for being tasteless/OOS but it is absolutely not “child porn” and I’m not going to be globally blocked over a misunderstanding that can be denied by 10 seconds of research. Dronebogus (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per the nomination and above, this file is no more than disgusting, disgraceful, and despicable. Magnatyrannus (talk) 05:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not edit warring with you but you are blocked for sock puppeting. Dronebogus (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am clearly aware of that but now my block is temporary and I have since learnt from socking. Either way, that's besides the point. Magnatyrannus (talk) 05:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The block was only from English Wikipedia (and is only temporary). Users that are blocked from Wikipedia are free to participate on commons. Hemiauchenia (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No educational value. Llwyld (talk) 07:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding the "as an adult" part: While not child pornography itself, if you're inspired by a child to draw a sexualized grown-up version of them, that's still creepy as hell (because, you know, it's still sexualizing someone who is a child). If it were a drawing of an identifiable human child as an adult, it would be a T&S issue; if it were drawing sexualized children, it would be a T&S issue. As it stands, it's just an unpleasant and unnecessary extension of Wikipe-tan fandom. Regardless, Dronebogus didn't invent this subgenre, and as they nominated the rest of the category for deletion, I'd like to suggest not giving them too hard a time about it going forward. For a lot of people, Wikipe-tan is cute fun, but as with any moe, it's also inherently connected to sexual attraction for some people. If you look at the Wikipe-tan category and look at the many, many, many subcategories, you can see that drawing Wikipe-tan as a teenager and as an adult, etc. is already something people were doing before Dronebogus. We've hosted pictures of her in e.g. swimsuits for years, and people all over the internet have drawn her in variously sexualized ways (some much more egregious). That's not an excuse -- just acknowledging that if you're someone who gets carried away by the ever-surprisingly popular cultural blight that is Wikipe-tan, it's not that shocking that this is where it goes. Expressing an interest in deleting them seems like a good course correction to me. — Rhododendrites talk |  12:55, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Wikipe-tan_Nude.png&oldid=696885068"